Posts tagged the evidence act 2006
Balancing Complainant Rights Against Defendant Rights: New Zealand’s Sexual Violence Legislation Bill
Cross-Examination: Mr Big – Entrapment in the Name of Evidence, or a Risk Not Worth the Reward?
Cross-Examinationejp_commsabuse of criminal process, admissibility of evidence, canada, coercion, constraints on police interrogation, crime scenario undercover technique, elias cj, foreign jurisdictions, glazebrook j, hannah yang, high court of australia, impropriety considerations, kamal reddy, mr big, police questioning, prejudice, r v hart, r v johnston, r v wichman, social poverty, Supreme Court, the evidence act 2006, tofilau v the queen, william young j, wrongful convictions
